Skip to content
ArcForge
Notifications (available in the full app)Request access

Preview mode — sample data only. Nothing here is saved.

AI analysis · Preview

Weld analysis — May 19, 2026

Educational visual feedback on a sample practice weld.

History
CompletedSample dataHigh confidenceSubmitted May 19, 2026, 10:10 PM

Overall practice band

DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

AI summary

This GTAW practice weld appears to show a couple of areas worth attention, alongside real strengths. Discoloration patterns may indicate shielding coverage was inconsistent. Overall consistency looks like it is still developing — normal at this stage. Focus on the priority improvement below, run the suggested drill, and submit a comparable weld to measure the change. Remember: surface appearance cannot confirm what is happening inside the joint.

You provided

Submission details

Process
GTAW (TIG)
Material
Chromoly
Thickness
0.065 in
Joint type
Corner joint
Position
2F — Horizontal fillet
Electrode
2% lanthanated
Electrode diameter
1/16 in
Filler metal
ER70S-2
Shielding gas
100% argon
Amperage
60 A
Travel speed
5 in/min
Polarity
DCEN (straight)
Passes
1
Preheat
None — thin wall
Practice objective
Uniform bead width on thin-wall tube corners.
Notes
Practice for roll-cage work. Tight outside corner, walking the cup.

Logged settings

This sample analysis isn’t linked to a weld log entry. In the real app, the wizard saves your submitted settings to the weld log by default — or links the session you already logged.

AI observations

Educational guidance only

AI-assisted visual feedback is educational guidance only and is not always accurate. A photograph cannot confirm code compliance, structural integrity, internal fusion, penetration, or test results, and it is no substitute for hands-on inspection. Have a qualified instructor or inspector evaluate any weld that matters.

Practice Score

ArcForge educational metrics — not inspection scores. Changes are measured against your previous comparable weld from May 16, 2026.

  • Bead consistency

    Steady
    DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

  • Profile control

    Down 1 band
    DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

  • Toe transition

    Up 1 band
    ConsistentLevel 3 of 5

  • Start & stop control

    Steady
    DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

  • Surface cleanliness

    Down 1 band
    DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

  • Visual uniformity

    Steady
    DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

  • Practice-objective alignment

    Steady
    DevelopingLevel 2 of 5

    Based on how the visible result relates to your stated objective.

Photo quality & limits

Feedback quality depends on what the camera captured. Anything below the surface is outside what a photo can show.

Image rating:Excellent

What shaped the confidence level

  • Welding details were provided, which sharpens interpretation.
  • The photo is clear and well lit.

What this review cannot tell you

  • Internal soundness, fusion, and penetration can never be judged from a photograph.
  • Lighting and angle can hide or exaggerate surface conditions.
  • This educational feedback is not an inspection and does not assess code acceptance.

What looks good

Strengths visible in this photo — keep building on them.

  • The stop shows attention to filling the crater.
  • The overall bead profile is reasonable for this stage of practice.
  • Spatter is well controlled for this process.

Priority improvements

Work these in order — each one builds on the last.

Why it matters

Discoloration patterns may indicate shielding coverage was inconsistent.

How to practice it

Produce consistent shielding color across a full bead.

Possible concerns

Visual indications only — a photo cannot confirm whether a discontinuity is actually present or how deep it goes. Where your instructor weighed in, their call is labeled and takes priority over the AI.

  • Possible shielding/oxidation concern

    UncertainModerate

    Location: toward the stop

    Discoloration patterns may indicate shielding coverage was inconsistent.

  • Inconsistent bead width

    PossibleModerate

    Location: toward the stop

    Bead width appears to vary noticeably along its length.

  • Possible underfill

    UncertainModerate

    Location: along the top toe

    The face appears slightly below flush in sections, which may indicate underfill.

Suggested practice drill

Coverage and angle audit

Produce consistent shielding color across a full bead. Run beads varying one factor at a time: torch angle, stick-out/arc length, and travel speed. Note the color band each change produces and find the combination giving the cleanest finish.

Add drills to a plan in the full app

Related lessons & defect reading

The full lessons and defect library live in the app — here’s what they cover.

Technique & equipment

Technique suggestions

  • Do a dry run along the joint before striking to confirm you can reach the full length comfortably.
  • Keep your arc length equal to about the electrode/wire diameter and check it whenever the sound changes.
  • Brace your hand or forearm so travel comes from your whole arm, not your wrist.

Equipment considerations

  • Consider whether 60 A gives you puddle control within 2-3 seconds of arc start; adjust in small steps.

System

Processing record

Status
Completed
Provider
mock
Model
arcforge-mock-1
Prompt version
v1
Schema version
v1
Attempts
1
Submitted
May 19, 2026, 10:10 PM
Completed
May 19, 2026, 10:10 PM

Analysis ID: preview-7