AI analysis · Preview
Weld analysis — May 26, 2026
Educational visual feedback on a sample practice weld.
Photo not stored
Weld photos are analyzed in memory and discarded unless you choose to save them.
Overall practice band
ConsistentLevel 3 of 5AI summary
This FCAW practice weld appears to show one main area worth attention, alongside real strengths. Linear surface marks may indicate worm tracking from gas issues in the flux. Overall consistency looks reasonably steady. Focus on the priority improvement below, run the suggested drill, and submit a comparable weld to measure the change. Remember: surface appearance cannot confirm what is happening inside the joint.
In the real app, this exact format is generated from a photo of your weld — and you can save it, send it to an instructor, and add the drill to a practice plan.
Request accessYou provided
Submission details
- Process
- FCAW (Flux-Core)
- Material
- Carbon steel
- Thickness
- 1/4 in
- Joint type
- T-joint
- Position
- 3F — Vertical fillet
- Filler metal
- E71T-1
- Shielding gas
- 100% CO₂
- Voltage
- 24 V
- Wire feed speed
- 350
- Travel speed
- 6 in/min
- Polarity
- DCEP (reverse)
- Passes
- 1
- Preheat
- None
- Practice objective
- Hold the puddle on vertical-up without the slag running ahead.
- Notes
- Vertical-up; slag wanted to run ahead in the middle third.
Logged settings
This sample analysis isn’t linked to a weld log entry. In the real app, the wizard saves your submitted settings to the weld log by default — or links the session you already logged.
AI observations
Educational guidance only
AI-assisted visual feedback is educational guidance only and is not always accurate. A photograph cannot confirm code compliance, structural integrity, internal fusion, penetration, or test results, and it is no substitute for hands-on inspection. Have a qualified instructor or inspector evaluate any weld that matters.
Practice Score
ArcForge educational metrics — not inspection scores.
- ConsistentLevel 3 of 5
Bead consistency
- DevelopingLevel 2 of 5
Profile control
- DevelopingLevel 2 of 5
Toe transition
- ConsistentLevel 3 of 5
Start & stop control
- ConsistentLevel 3 of 5
Surface cleanliness
- DevelopingLevel 2 of 5
Visual uniformity
- ConsistentLevel 3 of 5
Practice-objective alignment
Based on how the visible result relates to your stated objective.
Photo quality & limits
Feedback quality depends on what the camera captured. Anything below the surface is outside what a photo can show.
Photo issues noticed
- Minor glare on the bead face.
What shaped the confidence level
- Welding details were provided, which sharpens interpretation.
- Image quality is adequate but not ideal.
What this review cannot tell you
- Internal soundness, fusion, and penetration can never be judged from a photograph.
- Lighting and angle can hide or exaggerate surface conditions.
- This educational feedback is not an inspection and does not assess code acceptance.
Hot work stays hot: mark or quench practice pieces before anyone handles them.
What looks good
Strengths visible in this photo — keep building on them.
- The stop shows attention to filling the crater.
- The overall bead profile is reasonable for this stage of practice.
- The work area and plate look properly prepared.
Priority improvements
Work these in order — each one builds on the last.
Why it matters
Linear surface marks may indicate worm tracking from gas issues in the flux.
How to practice it
Build baseline arc control and consistency.
Possible concerns
Visual indications only — a photo cannot confirm whether a discontinuity is actually present or how deep it goes. Where your instructor weighed in, their call is labeled and takes priority over the AI.
Possible worm tracking
PossibleModerateLocation: along the top toe
Linear surface marks may indicate worm tracking from gas issues in the flux.
Suggested practice drill
Stringer-bead pads
Build baseline arc control and consistency. Fill a 4×6 in plate with parallel stringer beads, each overlapping the previous by one-third. Focus on a steady arc length and even travel. Photograph the pad and compare ripple consistency to your last session.
Add drills to a plan in the full appRelated lessons & defect reading
The full lessons and defect library live in the app — here’s what they cover.
Technique & equipment
Technique suggestions
- Brace your hand or forearm so travel comes from your whole arm, not your wrist.
- Do a dry run along the joint before striking to confirm you can reach the full length comfortably.
- Watch the back edge of the puddle rather than the arc itself.
Equipment considerations
- At 24 V, watch how the arc sounds — a harsh crackle may mean voltage is low for this wire-feed speed.
- Bracket wire-feed speed ±10% around 350 ipm to find the smoothest transfer for this setup.
System
Processing record
- Status
- Completed
- Provider
- mock
- Model
- arcforge-mock-1
- Prompt version
- v1
- Schema version
- v1
- Attempts
- 1
- Submitted
- May 26, 2026, 2:30 PM
- Completed
- May 26, 2026, 2:30 PM
Analysis ID: preview-3